01. Audit
Step 1: crawl data, not opinions.
SiteAud!tLint crawls every page, tag and template, then we review the accounts behind them. Nothing is prioritized until it is measured.
Technical
Indexing, canonicals, redirects, rendering and speed.
- Status codes and redirects
- Canonical and hreflang conflicts
- Core Web Vitals
On-page
Titles, headings, content depth and internal links.
- Duplicate and thin pages
- Keyword cannibalization
- Orphan pages
Tracking
Tags and conversions checked against what fires.
- GA4 and GTM tags
- Ad platform conversions
- Consent Mode
Structured data
Schema validated on every template.
- Organization and Service
- Product and FAQ
- Errors and warnings
AI search readiness
How AI crawlers and answer engines see the site.
- AI crawler access
- Entity signals
- llms.txt
Accounts
Ads, analytics and CRM setup reviewed.
- Ownership
- Wasted spend
- Data gaps
02. Prioritize
Step 2: impact and effort decide the order.
Each issue is scored on how much it affects traffic, leads or spend, and how hard it is to fix. The result is an Action Plan, not a backlog.
High impact · low effort
Do firstQuick wins shipped in the first weeks.
High impact · high effort
PlanScheduled projects with owners and dates.
Low impact · low effort
BatchGrouped and done when convenient.
Low impact · high effort
SkipLogged, then deliberately left alone.
Sample Action Plan (illustrative)
| Issue | Impact | Effort | Owner | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical tags point to the wrong URL version | High | Low | Developer | Week 1 |
| Lead form conversion counted twice in Google Ads | High | Low | remar.digital | Week 1 |
| Blog and resource pages target the same keywords | High | Medium | Content team | Weeks 2 to 4 |
| Product templates missing structured data | Medium | Medium | Developer | Month 2 |
| Image alt text missing on older posts | Low | Low | Content team | Batch |
03. Re-audit
Step 3: an audit comparison proves progress.
The same crawl runs again, and results are compared side by side with the last audit. Reports show what changed, not how busy we were.
Same checks, same settings
SiteAud!tLint runs the identical audit so results are comparable.
Fixed, new and unchanged
Every issue is matched against the previous audit.
Plain-language summary
What improved, what regressed and why.
Next month's Action Plan
New findings are scored and the plan is updated.
04. FAQ
Methodology questions.
What is SiteAud!tLint?
SiteAud!tLint is the crawler and audit tool built by remar.digital's founder. It checks every page, tag and template for technical, on-page, tracking and AI search issues, and produces the crawl data every engagement starts from.
How do you decide what to fix first?
Every issue gets an impact score and an effort score. High impact, low effort fixes ship first, high impact, high effort fixes are planned, and low impact issues are scheduled or ignored.
What is an audit comparison?
A re-crawl compared side by side with the previous audit. It shows which issues were fixed, which are new and how the overall health score changed, so progress is measured rather than claimed.
Is this methodology only for SEO?
No. The same audit, prioritize and re-audit loop is used for Google Ads, tracking, email and automation. Only the data sources change.
Can I see the Action Plan format before hiring you?
Yes. The free audit includes a short version with your site's top quick wins in the same format.
05. Get started
Start with a second opinion.
Tell us what you're running today and what's not working. You'll hear back from the person who will actually do the work.